|
Author | Topic: Windows XP (Read 110 times) |
[w00peR] Your Boss
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.angelfire.com/pro/computex/1559.gif)
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 79
|  | Windows XP « Thread Started on Oct 25, 2003, 9:37am » | |
Windows XP operating system comments and stuff...
|
![[image]](http://www.angelfire.com/goth2/rpgforum/monestary.jpg) |
|
Mercenary Staff Member
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.angelfire.com/mn/unsimpsons/images/devil.gif)
Admin's Cousin
Joined: Oct 2003 Gender: Male  Posts: 48 Location: Somwhere I Belong
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #1 on Oct 25, 2003, 2:10pm » | |
I hate it ... EATS too much RAM ..... That's my opinion ..
| _____________________________________
We are not laughing at you, we are laughing with you.
Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. - Tolkien |
|
Jared Your Boss
     member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 23
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #2 on Oct 25, 2003, 5:19pm » | |
It's defintely a memory hog. I have 312MBs of RAM and it just runs smooth. Barely. 512MBs is recommended for the beast.
| |
|
galaxy Noob
 member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 3
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #3 on Oct 25, 2003, 6:20pm » | |
i'm k with Xp but it's really sucks man
| |
|
[w00peR] Your Boss
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.angelfire.com/pro/computex/1559.gif)
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 79
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #4 on Oct 25, 2003, 6:21pm » | |
I agree with all of you... They messed it up.. totally!
|
![[image]](http://www.angelfire.com/goth2/rpgforum/monestary.jpg) |
|
Jared Your Boss
     member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 23
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #5 on Oct 25, 2003, 7:19pm » | |
Windows 2000 is better cause you don't have to register and you can get by with 128MBs of RAM, runs perfect with 256MBs of RAM.
| |
|
myOSNT Staff Member
     member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 21
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #6 on Oct 26, 2003, 11:02pm » | |
you people obviously have never even looked into the true qualitys of Windows XP. I am a linux user, so for me to say this is not something i do often, WINDOWS XP IS NOT A BAD OS! that said, ill explain my self: First off, windows XP needs 256 ram to run normaly, and its optimal for a 1.6ghz processer. Second, you can reduce the tear on your memory by makeing a larger page file (like linux swap, virtual ram). I have an AMD Athlon 2400+ XP system, and it has 384mb ram, and it runs XP KILLER! it runs linux good too, but xp is also good. Now, im sure the people saying this are using XP Home, and i understand why you dont like it. And lastly, if your os runs slow, its because of too many un-needed processes, viruses and cross-linked files. have any of you ever gone to run and typed in cmd then typed in chkdsk /f? That will improve performance. ask me if you system isnt running good, ill make it run better.
| What? They have the internet on computers now? I sold my virginity on ebay once, it was a bad idea. Some guy bought it. OpenWar forum | Tech Forum |
|
Jared Your Boss
     member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 23
|  | Re: Windows XP « Reply #7 on Oct 27, 2003, 5:23pm » | |
I agree the things you can do on it are great. See, you mentioned one thing though. Optimized for a 1.6Ghz processor or better. I'm on a 1.3Ghz so I experience a slight lag. Not a whole lot, but enough to irritate me at times. I'm only on XP for 2 reasons. 1, my dialup doesn't work as well with win2k as it does xp. See cause on win2k for some reason the drivers for it aren't optimized and my connections take several attempts. On XP I dial up on the first attempt everytime. 2. Win2K pro, as great as it is, doesn't have a movie maker.
| |
|
myOSNT Staff Member
     member is offline
Joined: Oct 2003 Posts: 21
| |
|